For Co-Founders

Make the next decision from the same numbers.

You can own different parts of the business and still begin the decision from one current financial position. RunwayCal keeps recorded reality, the working plan, and possible scenarios distinct so both founders can see what changed and discuss what happens next.

See the founder workflow Explore Mission Control

Founder AHiring timing

Can the business carry the role now?

Founder BCollection timing

What happens if the receipt lands late?

Shared contextRecorded cash · Obligations · Plan · Timing

Human decisionDiscuss the tradeoff, then choose together.

Conceptual founder review. RunwayCal supplies financial context; the founders make the decision.

Hire

Can we hire now?

Spend

Can we increase spend?

Cash

What cash actually arrived?

Timing

What if a customer pays late?

Assumption

Which assumption changed?

Status

Is this hypothetical or already committed?

01 / One starting point

Begin with the business as it stands now.

Before debating a hire or a new commitment, look at the same recorded financial picture. Mission Control brings current cash, burn, runway, revenue, and operating context into the review without turning a plan or scenario into a fact.

Explore Mission Control

RunwayCal Mission Control showing the current financial overview — Real product evidence. Mission Control gives both founders the same recorded starting point.

02 / Facts and assumptions

Keep what happened separate from what you are debating.

A late receipt, a proposed hire, and an approved supplier payment do not have the same status. Label the difference before discussing the move.

Recorded realityCash receivedCosts recordedKnown obligations

Working assumptionsExpected receipt dateProposed hiring datePlanned spending

Founder reviewWhich assumption are we debating?

Conceptual status guide. Expected money and proposed decisions remain separate from recorded financial reality.

03 / Test before committing

Change the assumption, not the actuals.

Test a hiring date, spending choice, collection delay, or revenue assumption in a scenario. The result is hypothetical. It gives the founders a consequence to discuss, not an answer chosen by RunwayCal.

Explore Scenarios

RunwayCal Scenarios workspace comparing hypothetical financial assumptions — Real product evidence. Scenario outcomes remain hypothetical until the founders decide what to do.

RunwayCal Planner showing revenue assumptions and their financial effect — Real product evidence. Planner keeps the assumptions behind the working plan visible.

04 / See what changed

Bring the next discussion back to the plan.

Compare the working plan with what actually happened. If revenue, spending, or timing moved, both founders can see which assumption needs another look before changing the plan or the operation.

ActualPlanVarianceFounder question

Conceptual review sequence. The variance informs a discussion; it does not explain itself.

Explore Planner

05 / Keep the trail clear

Make the discussion understandable later.

Keep the starting point, assumption, scenario, and reviewed decision in a sequence that finance or an advisor can follow. Sharing context does not hand the judgment to the software.

Current reality

Review recorded cash, revenue, costs, and obligations.

Decision in discussion

Name the hire, spend, or timing question.

Scenario

Change the relevant assumption without rewriting actuals.

Consequence

Compare what could change in cash, burn, and runway.

Founder decision

Discuss the tradeoff and choose the next move together.

Conceptual decision trail. Product context supports the review; the founders remain responsible for the decision.

Plan a hire Review plan versus actual Plan around cash timing See plans and pricing

One current picture. One decision to discuss.

Make the next decision from the same numbers.

Start from recorded reality, test the assumption in question, and make the call together with the consequence in view.

Start free See pricing